No Reason Or Ration For Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins found out that there is no reason or ration with feminists who took offence at a link on one of his tweets.
The link pointed out the obvious fact that refugee rape was hidden from the media and news channels as well as do the feminists.
And so the cancelled his invitation and labeled the video as “hate speech”.

“The Northeast Conference on Science & Skepticism has withdrawn its invitation to Richard Dawkins to participate at NECSS 2016. We have taken this action in response to Dr. Dawkins’ approving re-tweet of a highly offensive video.

We believe strongly in freedom of speech and freedom to express unpopular, and even offensive, views. However, unnecessarily divisive, counterproductive, and even hateful speech runs contrary to our mission and the environment we wish to foster at NECSS.”

Of course, there is no freedom of speech when they disagree with the speech.
How can not be skeptic about The Northeast Conference on Science & Skepticism.

As the feminists started ganging up on Dick Dawkins, he deleted the tweet.
And then was he cancelled citing “consequences for sharing hateful stuff”

As usual it doesn’t make sense to a rational person, including Richard who indentifies as a feminist himself and said he had “faith in the goodness of humanity”.

The lesson here is that men can call themselves feminists for years, but the slightest transgression will bring a raking over hot coals.
The more famous that man, the better.

Phoebe Moloney Falsely Accuses Neomasculinity As Rape Support

And article authored by Phoebe Moloney is making the rounds of Australian newspapers and facebook with an attached video calling for the sabotage of ROK’s masculinity meetings.

Phoebe does all she can to discredit Roosh’s satirical post about rape and the readers just swallow it hook line and sinker as the article is written so that the main message comes across as “Supporters of legal rape” are meeting in Sydney, Hyde Park.

The article appears across Fairfax media news sites such Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, and others.

Also being relinked and spread by other journalists such as Timna Jacks, Ben Cubby, Nick Ralston, Eryk Bagshaw and Tory Shepherd.
The media is going in full spin over this as nobody questions what is written or check the sources.

The SJW will be coming out in force as the masses of macho white knights swallow the media bullshit.

Phoebe Moloney accuses ROK of supporting rape.

Who Wears The Pants At A Voice For Men?

After pointing out that AVFM’s feminist writer could not possibly know anything about the benefits or problems with PUAs and that her writing is confused jibberish, I duly got banned by another female that wears the pants at AVFM.

Sure there are some fakes and charlatans, but many PUA writers have great insight that would benefit any man, especially young men.
And the main focus is always on self improvement instead of bitching and whining.

Is Paul Elam really that desperate that he can find men to run his forum and site?
Have women become the voice for men and the MRA movement?

Are MRAs really such losers that women have become their voice?
And a voice that shames other men who are seeking to improve themselves, improve their social life, improve their value and lead a happier life?

Instead of encouraging men to take self improvement action AVFM’s writers seems to shame them.
Losers they are for wanting to improve their social life, their appearance and yes wanting to have sex with women.
PUAs tech men to be proud of the masculinity and sexuality, AVFM now teaches them to be shamed bitches.

The real losers are Paul Elam and his male followers as the women’s voice for men runs rings around them just as the other emasculating women in their lives did. Good luck with that.
“PUA” and “Game’ has never been my preferred term, but what it refers to is the only hope for men to improve their social lives, be happier, have lots of sex or just find someone who may be compatible for something longer than a fling.


AVFM FOr Women

Spoken like a true lady that has become the voice for men.

Do Not Rely On Prenups!

As much as I love reading Good Looking Loser I don’t think he understands how weak prenups can actually be.
As soon as assets previously held start getting intermingled it’s pretty much gone out the window.

For some security assets must be owned before marriage, held in separate financial structures and never intermingled with personal or jointly owned anything.
Offshore is even better.
All of this needs to be done beforehand, preferably long before you ever met her.

This is not intended to be advice, just an opinion based on what I’ve seen.
But do talk to a lawyer experienced in such matters about this stuff if you have done well for yourself.
Do not rely on the internet for this.